English language teacher education and contrastive rhetoric laura m. During the 1970s the development of text linguistics or discourse analysis might. Design the research was organised to resemble at any moment a classroom assessment procedure. Contrastive rhetoric is an area of research in second language acquisition that identifies problems in composition encountered by second language writers and, by referring to the rhetorical strategies of the first language, attempts to explain them.
Contrastive rhetoric is the study of how a persons first language and his or her culture influence. Although its initial impetus was linguistic analysis of written texts in collegelevel academic contexts, contrastive rhetoric has expanded its focus to the exploration of various genres, disciplines, and composing processes, as summarized by a pioneering monograph on contrastive rhetoric research by connor 1996. Adobe digital editions this is a free app specially developed for ebooks. Although mainly concerned with student essay writing in its first 30 years. Its original incarnation, contrastive rhetoric cr, began in 1966. Variety is the spice of life, and an international community like that at unc charlotte provides a wealth of opportunities for learning about other cultures. Connor, 9780521446884, available at book depository with free delivery worldwide.
This volume explores the field of contrastive rhetoric, the stu. Contrastive rhetoric in shona and english argumentative essay. So i am desired to join your team and get your advise. The writers had sixty minutes to prepare, write and revise. Crosscultural aspects of second language writing cambridge applied linguistics series by ulla m. There was a right way of doing things a way that was established and accepted. It furthers the universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Pdf contrastive rhetoric download read online free. Follow to get new release updates and improved recommendations. Crosscultural aspects of second language writing cambridge applied linguistics 9780521446884. Indiana universitypurdue university at indianapolis, cavanaugh hall. Under the umbrella of contrastive rhetoric and pragmatics, students will explore interdisciplinary intersections among theoretical frames and methodologies in linguistics and rhetoric with the goal of locating new kinds of questions and problems not typically considered within traditional disciplinary boundaries. A brief essay by ulla connor, contrastive rhetoric redefined, helps make the transition from contrastive rhetoric as a tool for understanding english as a second language rhetorical and pedagogical issues to a means for culturally diverse exploration. Purpose kaplans 1966 article connecting student writers paragraph organization with their cultural thought patternsalso known as contrastive rhetorichas had a significant impact on the field of l2 writing.
It presents a comprehensive view of the research in this field, emphasizing the connections between contrastive rhetoric and the related disciplines of composition studies, cultural anthropology, translation studies, and text linguistics. New directions contrastive rhetoric initially aimed at identifying esl students problems in their compositions by referring to the rhetorical strategies of the first language connor, 1998. Intercultural rhetoric and espeap ulla connor, phd chancellors professor of english, indiana universitypurdue university indianapolis barbara e. Ulla connor has been one of the few researchers which have studied argumentative texts within contrastive rhetoric and using her prompt, repeatedly tested, enhances the reliability of our research. However, pedagogical applications of cr research have received much less attention. Cambridge university press 9780521446884 contrastive rhetoric.
Evidence from the english expository writings of chinese efl learners and their teachers writing instruction. Like other titles in the cambridge applied linguistic series, contrastive rhetoric is clearly organised to allow both the lay teacher and the specialist in second language writing ease of access to specific information whilst also being a satisfying cover to cover read. Paper presented at the british educational research association annual conference, university of warwick, 69 september 2006. Oxford university press is a department of the university of oxford. The utility which rhetoric was to serve was the maintenance of harmony.
In a 2002 article, connor attempted to address these criticisms and to offer new directions for a viable contrastive rhetoric. This book synthesizes the findings of contrastive rhetoric research up to the mid1990s and explores its relationship with other disciplines such as composition, text linguistics, translation studies, and genre studies. Easily share your publications and get them in front of issuus. This volume explores contrastive rhetoric for audiences in both esl contexts and international efl contexts. Contrastive rhetoric, started by robert kaplan 1966, is an area. Nov, 2012 contrastive rhetoric research shows that different cultures have different expectations of writing and that these different expectations are internalized as different patterns of discourse. Contrastive rhetoric has been growing since 1966 and nobody had taken care of setting down its theoretical foundations and its reserch methodology until ulla connor has done it. Since 1966, when kaplans original work on contrastive rhetoric appeared, and 1996, when ulla connor s book on contrastive rhetoric reinvigorated interest in the area, new trends have appeared in research approaches and methods. The book presents a comprehensive view of the research in this field and presents sound advice for dealing with crosscultural issues in writing classes. Conner ulla contrastive rhetoric cross cultural aspects of second language from engl 2010 at utah valley university. Development of contrastive rhetoric studies for years after the introduction of the idea of contrastive rhetoric little progress was made in this type of text analysis. Initiated almost thirty years ago by the american applied linguist robert kaplan, contrastive rhetoric maintains that language and writing are. Edited by ulla connor, ed nagelhout, and william rozycki find, read and cite. Crosscultural aspects of second language writing cambridge.
Understanding contrastive rhetoric well makes people realize explicitly how writing in different languages works. A read is counted each time someone views a publication summary such as the title, abstract, and list of authors, clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the fulltext. This volume explores the field of contrastive rhetoric, the study of how a persons first language and culture influence his or her writing in a second language. The way to this goal was through ceremony, etiquette, and methodology. Oct 04, 2011 language and rhetoric reflect culture, and this video discusses argumentation strategies from around the world. The field of contrastive rhetoric, founded by robert kaplan in the 1960s, emphasizes kaplans belief that ell students development of ideas in writing is systematically different from the patterns that appear to be natural in english. Contrastive rhetoric ulla m connor by sebastianpinson issuu. A dynamic model of l2 writing paul kei matsuda purdue universi the notion of controstive rhetoric was first proposed as a pedagogic01 solu tion to the problem of l2 orgonization, and the subsequent development in. Contrastive rhetoric isbn 9780521441452 pdf epub ulla m. Colombo the contested place of cr studies for improperly grouping lan born within the frame of applied linguistics and secondlanguage acquisition, contrastive rhetoric cr is an interdisciplinary field that has led to some very productive. Contrastive rhetoric entered an extended period of critique and development in the 1990s, resulting in its reformulation as intercultural rhetoric in 2004.
Contrastive rhetoric examines differences and similarities in writing across cultures. Contrastive rhetoric and contrastive analysis are both fields of study in. Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish magazines, catalogs, newspapers, books, and more online. Contrastive rhetoric in shona and english argumentative essay swahili edition thondhlana, juliet on. Contrastive rhetoric then expanded its domain to include further areas of inquiry. Pdf on dec 23, 2008, will baker and others published contrastive rhetoric. Intercultural rhetoric and espeap ulla connor, phd nus. Articles new directions in contrastive rhetoric 493 1966. Contrastive rhetoric in shona and english argumentative essay swahili edition. New directions in contrastive rhetoric connor 2002. Cultural differences in writing have been studied extensively within the field of contrastive rhetoric cr since kaplans, 1966 study see connor, 1996, connor, 2002, connor, 2003 for overviews. A grand theory of contrastive rhetoric of the sort that kaplan envisioned may not be forthcoming but the following bibliography should provide the researcher interested in. As a result, contrastive rhetoric henceforth, cr has invariably established itself as a viable object of linguistic inquiry and secured for itself a niche in the field of applied linguistics.
Ulla connor s book is further testimony to that fact. Cambridge university press writing ulla connor frontmatter. The cornerstone of contrastive rhetoric the theory of contrastive rhetoric was originated from the theory of linguistic relativity, called the sapirwhorf hypothesis of linguistic relativity or the whorfian hypothesis, which suggests that different languages affect perception and thought in different ways connor, 1996. Conner ulla contrastive rhetoric cross cultural aspects of. Rhetoric in chinese society thus came to be very much akin to sheer propriety. Four chapters provide ethnographies and observations about contrastive rhetoric and the teaching of efl and esl. The most influential specialist on cr together with robert b. Contrastive rhetoric is an area of research in secondlanguage acquisition that identifies problems in composition encountered by secondlanguage writers and, by referring to the rhetorical strategies of the first language, attempts to explain them connor 1996. Journal of second language writing vol 25, pages 1122. Its not the same as adobe reader, which you probably. Mainly the works of jacques derrida in the 1970s illustrating the differences in a words meanings in reference to other words around it is a significant. It presents a comprehensive view of the research in this field, emphasizing the connections between contrastive rhetoric and the related disciplines of composition studies, cultural anthropology. In addressing the critiques, she aimed to draw attention to the broad scope of contrastive rhetoric and determined that a new term would better encompass the essence of contrastive rhetoric in its current state.
489 750 1173 416 915 1542 751 1302 1142 431 1558 1528 1510 1022 903 790 745 690 1464 412 265 781 136 519 827 310 1030 1007 1388 785 291 546